Archis's Blog

May 16, 2008

The real heroes behind India’s (alleged) reverse brain-drain

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , — archisgore @ 12:55 pm

While chatting with a friend who was debating whether or not he should pursue his Ph.D. degree (or any higher studies, for that matter) in India, the topic turned to the changing conditions in India (or more appropriately, the change in observable behaviour of Indians – since I don’t presume to know all conditions in India).

Much is made in newspaper articles, media, and in social circles about the alleged reverse brain drain. I say alleged, simply because I don’t want this article biased in either way – I do have an opinion about the brain drain situation, but that’s for another day and another time. Here we shall simply assume that there does exist such a thing as a reverse brain drain (without debating its veracity – or definition for that matter).

You might have noticed a steadily increasing trend in media reporting two major themes:

  1. Prominent/Successful people of Indian origin returning to settle down in India after having achieved fame/success abroad.
  2. The young generation of Indians not leaving India after getting prominent degrees, as used to be the “hip thing” back in the 80′s.

What bothers me most is the complete disregard shown to those who really caused about this change. Surely the change is in India that makes people want to come back or remain here; which is far more likely than America or Europe having become an unsuitable place to live in (last I heard, India has gained shopping malls and multiplexes, rather than Europe or America losing them). Correct me if I am mistaken, but in my personal opinion, this change was brought about not by those who are coming back today, but by those who never left 30 years ago!

Someone had to live in this country when the cream of our country was leaving with much fanfare and praise. Someone had to improve the conditions. Someone had to build multiplexes and malls. Someone had to build airconditioned seven-star hotels. Someone had to build the 1 lakh car that many (if not most) Indians will afford. Every year, media praisee those from the premier (and in many cases, tax-payer-funded) institutions of the country hired abroad. We conveniently ignore to report on those who stayed back and brought about a change here – in this country – to make it suitable for our elite to come back and live in.

Where is the praise to them? What have we done to encourage them? When we write an article praising youngsters studying in India for higher education, why can’t we spare one line to say, “thanks to the heroes who toiled for 30 years to make India a great place to live in…”? When we comment on the great people returning, why can’t we add the line, “thanks to the people who worked through hardships to bring multiplexes, and malls and air-conditioned homes, and water and electricity and flyovers to our cities…”?

So far as I have seen, I don’t know many (if not any) who returned from the US to live in a village or even a non-metro (although I do know Americans staying in villages for volunteer work.) Let’s face it, they didn’t come back for travelling in public transportation and to have only one hour of tap water every day.

For some reason, our culture loves redemption stories; always has. We completely ignore people who are just doing good work – I don’t say that we criticise them, we simply just don’t care. However, take a guy who goes on the wrong path initially and years later chooses to turn towards the rigth path? We love him! We praise him! He’s like a God to us. Lest we forget that wrong path and right path are completely subjective to begin with.

I think it’s time we did justice to all that “traditions” and “philosophy” and “family” and “loyalty” crap we like to boast in front of westerners. Let’s stop speaking and show it for once! Let’s see some respect for those who made this a great place to live in. Someone brought about this change in India – it wasn’t just physical – it was also psychological. Someone stayed here and worked hard to change the attitude of people.

I think we can all spare at least one newspaper article, or even a small one-liner when discussing reverse-brain-drain amongst peers, in praise of the heroes who made it all happen!

May 12, 2008

A thought experiment for Open Source fanatics

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , , , — archisgore @ 10:33 pm

Update: I got a response from the FSF which is quite satisfactory and makes sense.

Yes — but from a technology standpoint, we don’t know how to provide
that yet. Even if a search engine provided you with all of the source
you needed to run your own implementation, and modify it, it’s unlikely
that you have the resources to do so. Keeping track of all this data
for the entire web requires a lot of storage. Keeping your index
up-to-date requires plenty of bandwidth.

The FSF recently hosted a summit to discuss this issue and consider
options for moving forward; see
<http://www.fsf.org/news/FreedomForWebServices>. The group that was
convened will continue this work, and we expect to be publishing more
details about it shortly. Keep your eye on our web site for updates.

Best regards,


Brett Smith
Licensing Compliance Engineer, Free Software Foundation

Original Post:
Today, I read this article titled, Google’s open source problem is Affero on Zdnet. Frequent readers will know my previous article titled, “GPLv3: Is Stallman taking sides?” which got me the standard mails teaching me “philosophy” and “greater purpose of life” (read: made absolutely no sense whatsoever).

The reason I brought this up again is because I still don’t have an answer to this question I have – and for all the openness and ask-me-anything nature that everyone attempts to project, people have been remarkably un-open and ask-me-anything-but-I-won’t-answer on this issue. If any readers would like to offer me answers, I welcome them.

What bothered me most was this quote on the FSF’s FAQ on GPLv3: However, some companies that develop and rely upon free software consider this requirement to be too burdensome.

Since when did a company’s “burden” bother the FSF? Since when did “making sure a company keeps making money” become the reason for compromising on the FSF’s definition of Freedom (I say “FSF’s definition”, because I allow every human being the freedom to choose their definition of freedom).

I take the comment below back (I haven’t figured out a way to “strike out” text yet). As Joe has pointed out in the comments, ASP refers to “Application Service Providers”. This is the kind of constructive answer that helps. :-) Thanks man!
An interesting fact pointed out by Stallman is the popularity of ASP though. He calls this the “ASP loophole”. It appears that any webservice whose code you don’t have access to, runs on Microsoft-developed ASP technology. Now that’s cool…. I don’t really have access to Google’s code you know. :-) Isn’t that something to think about – so much for all you guys who claim PHP/Perl/whatever are also popular. “Also” just doesn’t cut it – unless a site has it’s code out in the open, it’s running Microsoft ASP – Stallman has spoken! He didn’t call it the “PHP loophole”, or “server-side scripting loophole”. It appears ASP is so damn popular above all those pathetic alternatives, that “server-side scriptiong” is analogous to “ASP”. Wow!

In the meantime, here’s a thought experiment for you.

  1. We can all agree, that the HTML page you get are really rendering instructions at worse, and some kind of scripting at best. In essence, it is data which tells the browser what you see. For all we care, it could be any format. HTML is just the format that we incidentally came up with or began to use.
  2. And you get prophet-certified by GPLv3′ing all code. Hence it only makes sense that you only use GPLv3′d code on your desktops. I can live with that.
  3. Now, if a company developed a GPLv3′d OS with remote desktop capability that ran on their data centers, it too becomes prophet-certified saving-the-world pure. Then they distribute the client-code to you which allows you to remote onto a desktop on the cloud – and you have all the freedom – all 100% baptiz…uhh… I meant certified! (Lest you flame me, the company should also publish specs of the remoting protocol.)

And there you go – you have a completely free software story. Personally, when someone claims it’s supposed to allow me to “learn, modify, experiment, etc.”, I can’t do that without the source code, GPLv3′d or not. But I guess there are a bunch of hyper-intelligent people out there who, merely by the application of a licence to the code (also indicative of the awesome heavenly power of the licence in question), can study, learn or modify the code – without having access to it!

Amazing, simply amazing!

Theme: Silver is the New Black. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 130 other followers