I’ve noticed my positive posts on Windows Phone 7 devices are rarely as well-taken as when I criticize them.
I had to mention this, in the interest of fairness, that I’m highly impressed at Nokia. If you believe this hurts their reputation, you probably don’t understand the consumer very well. I’ve personally worked in teams which were squeamish about their product, and in others where responding fast was the culture. I assure you owning up to a problem and responding to it head-on may seem like a dumb move for a slick used car salesman in “business school”, but I’ve been involved in forums and blogs where I know it to work wonders.
Nokia has done what Microsoft is probably incapable of pulling off. When a problem arises, I believe there are two ways to go:
Either you just don’t say anything – and this works if you’re the incumbent (Apple in iPhone 4, MSFT in Vista.) Overtime there is enough uptake that you don’t have to defend your position anymore. You just quote “It is installed on 90% of desktops” and don’t elaborate on that. There is nothing wrong with this approach, because when you’re on 90% of desktops or 90% of phones there’s going to be a few of truthers uncovering conspiracies that don’t exist and you don’t want to encourage the perception that anyone can make stupid claims and the company will spend time and money responding.
The other way to deal with this is head-on. By responding on your own terms rather than being cornered into doing it. That way, you control the narrative and you control the perception. That’s how Google got their market-cred amongst geeks. Rumour was, Google’s “feedback” form never went into a black hole. Issues were responded to head-on.
Nokia’s timeline of events is one that has left me in awe. They launched a certain phone on one Sunday. By Monday, people had “perceived” some issue with connectivity. By Tuesday Nokia had figured out what it was, given a 100$ credit of good-will to each buyer, committed to delivering a fix by the following Monday which can be downloaded, or if you don’t even want that, you could just outright replace your phone with a fixed phone. I’m sure this came as a pleasant surprise to everyone who bought the phone even if only 5% faced the issue (and incidentally helped avoid any numbers or percentages from being discussed.)
I think if Nokia ever does come back from the dump, instead of all the trash-talking and iPhone funerals by Microsoft, I’m going to mark this specific moment as the inflection point when it all changed. If I ever wondered “Why Nokia? Couldn’t anyone make good quality phones?” I just got my answer. Nokia because… this! I don’t know of any other company who could have pulled this off.
Instead of having weird arguments or being cornered by journalists, and before there were 10 articles that pointed to “Nokia’s Data Connectivity Problem”, in about 24 hours, there were a thousand more which said, “Lumia 900 practically free. Minor issue, but fix coming in 5 days. 100$ rebate.” Instead of a blog post by “General Manager of Nokia Lumia 900 customer experiences division” assuring us of “appropriate action being taken and a fix coming soon”, and got the entire company giving us a coherent line: “Nokia has noticed. Nokia has the fix. Plus here’s a good-will gesture.”
Even on technical grounds, it’s fairly impressive. There are a handful of companies on this planet who would figure out the software bug in less than 24 hours, and commit to delivering it to all handsets before the end of the week.
I now believe any OS could piggyback on this company and gain a good marketshare, and remembered why even I, before the iPhone, was a hardcore Nokia phone user all my life. The moment they match my phone spec-for-spec and add software that matches my phone spec-for-spec, I no longer have concerns about being left to die in the wilderness for lack of support – if Microsoft gets upto their usual antics, Nokia’s got my back.