Archis's Blog

April 12, 2012

Good going Nokia

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , — archisgore @ 11:19 pm

I’ve noticed my positive posts on Windows Phone 7 devices are rarely as well-taken as when I criticize them.

I had to mention this, in the interest of fairness, that I’m highly impressed at Nokia. If you believe this hurts their reputation, you probably don’t understand the consumer very well. I’ve personally worked in teams which were squeamish about their product, and in others where responding fast was the culture. I assure you owning up to a problem and responding to it head-on may seem like a dumb move for a slick used car salesman in “business school”, but I’ve been involved in forums and blogs where I know it to work wonders.

Nokia has done what Microsoft is probably incapable of pulling off. When a problem arises, I believe there are two ways to go:

Either you just don’t say anything – and this works if you’re the incumbent (Apple in iPhone 4, MSFT in Vista.)  Overtime there is enough uptake that you don’t have to defend your position anymore. You just quote “It is installed on 90% of desktops” and don’t elaborate on that. There is nothing wrong with this approach, because when you’re on 90% of desktops or 90% of phones there’s going to be a few of truthers uncovering conspiracies that don’t exist and you don’t want to encourage the perception that anyone can make stupid claims and the company will spend time and money responding.

The other way to deal with this is head-on. By responding on your own terms rather than being cornered into doing it. That way, you control the narrative and you control the perception. That’s how Google got their market-cred amongst geeks. Rumour was, Google’s “feedback” form never went into a black hole. Issues were responded to head-on.

Nokia’s timeline of events is one that has left me in awe. They launched a certain phone on one Sunday. By Monday, people had “perceived” some issue with connectivity. By Tuesday Nokia had figured out what it was, given a 100$ credit of good-will to each buyer, committed to delivering a fix by the following Monday which can be downloaded, or if you don’t even want that, you could just outright replace your phone with a fixed phone. I’m sure this came as a pleasant surprise to everyone who bought the phone even if only 5% faced the issue (and incidentally helped avoid any numbers or percentages from being discussed.)

I think if Nokia ever does come back from the dump, instead of all the trash-talking and iPhone funerals by Microsoft, I’m going to mark this specific moment as the inflection point when it all changed. If I ever wondered “Why Nokia? Couldn’t anyone make good quality phones?” I just got my answer. Nokia because… this! I don’t know of any other company who could have pulled this off.

Instead of having weird arguments or being cornered by journalists, and before there were 10 articles that pointed to “Nokia’s Data Connectivity Problem”, in about 24 hours, there were a thousand more which said, “Lumia 900 practically free. Minor issue, but fix coming in 5 days. 100$ rebate.” Instead of a blog post by “General Manager of Nokia Lumia 900 customer experiences division” assuring us of “appropriate action being taken and a fix coming soon”, and got the entire company giving us a coherent line: “Nokia has noticed. Nokia has the fix. Plus here’s a good-will gesture.”

Even on technical grounds, it’s fairly impressive. There are a handful of companies on this planet who would figure out the software bug in less than 24 hours, and commit to delivering it to all handsets before the end of the week.

I now believe any OS could piggyback on this company and gain a good marketshare, and remembered why even I, before the iPhone, was a hardcore Nokia phone user all my life. The moment they match my phone spec-for-spec and add software that matches my phone spec-for-spec, I no longer have concerns about being left to die in the wilderness for lack of support – if Microsoft gets upto their usual antics, Nokia’s got my back.

January 12, 2012

More on Windows Phone in light of CES announcements

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , — archisgore @ 5:54 am

Many think I’m an “Apple Fanboy” – which is sort-of true (I’m a fan of the iPhone, not Apple.) It’s a matter of semantics really – I appreciate and value a good thing when I see it. When you don’t have a good product, fanboy or not, I don’t care a lot.

Always good indicator of Microsoft’s product quality is the employee’s Facebook feeds. Managers at MSFT don’t have to panic – none of my friends leak any information.

For anyone with plenty of time and academic curiosity to test my hypothesis, they should go analyse the Facebook/Twitter timelines of employee posts. One of the things I learnt the hard way in my almost-five years there is that very very few Microsofties are what you might call – true academicians (though those that exist are the ones behind what you see succeeding today.) My respect and admiration for Terry Myerson is a matter of Google’ing my past posts, and I’d dare you to find anyone of the thousands of people to whom I complain about WP to, to quote even a single instance where I have spoken against him.

The trend there is to throw around the word ‘innovation’, ‘synergy’, ‘dynamism’, etc. a lot and quote past examples, and find new process names to try. It’s pretty annoying to hear a softie promote their product at times (there was one blog out of the thousands who really questioned whether all softies speak the way Charlie Kindel does – most do in fact.) I have many analyses as to why most Microsoft people appear to be totally out of touch with reality (heck I worked on Messenger and Hotmail – you don’t even want to go there!) The problem is, for a large part of the last decade, all you had to do was build stuff, and it’d get a cool few million users without any effort and you post-justify success with MBA-speak. Windows was the vehicle. You slap some WPF on there, and it inevitably gets picked up. You never have to convince or sell developers on, how or why, WPF improved the things you could do compared to other alternatives.

Which is why when WP was announced, the first thing they did was to hold an iPhone funeral. My FB feed was practically filled with death-threats. Try and suggest one feature missing in your Windows Phone, and you get attacked with all kinds of straw-men. The same rhetoric over and over distills down to one or more of the following:

1. Whatever you ask for is irrelevant. Yes, it’s only perception that you need a compass in maps. People got along fine before, and people will get along fine without it. Don’t be such a prick and feel entitled to anything. We don’t owe you anything, so don’t suggest features.

2. The iPhone never had it in 2007. (Not sure what they try to say here, but in their world apparently, that’s a defense)

3. Maybe it’s not for you (and this is said with some kind of pride of elitism – we’re the 1% few who appreciate the true value of a magical world-saving device)

4. It’ll be successful in 2015 (this one really confuses you – I could go on and on about how utterly ridiculous it is to expect me to pay $300 bucks for your phone NOW because it’s 3rd model four years from today will leap frog the competitions model then after you’ve paid for a couple of additional $300 upgrades.)

I got sidetracked. My apologies. As I was saying, the academicians – let me clarify here. There is a mistaken belief that Academicians are people without purpose. Heck they know purpose and they know money. What it really means is people who are dedicated to building a good product, just ‘because’! In its day Microsoft did come out with some pretty good stuff just because – COM being the best one I can name right now. Even Windows Mobile was pretty impressive for its time.

I think at this CES finally, there is a Windows Phone device that really makes me “think”. I’m not saying I’ll buy it – because I recently threw out my Focus for a 4S (yeah, if you made me pay $300 bucks for a shitty device, I’m waiting till a WP offers me TWICE as much as my iPhone to make up for the difference. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.) But for once, I see a device I would have been genuinely (as opposed to defensively) proud of, if I worked at either Microsoft or Nokia.

Many of you may not know this, and it seems like a pretty childish thing to do, but one way to get softies to shut up about their ‘superior’ OS for the past year, was to carry a few hundred dollars or a couple of blank checks in your pocket. Anytime someone used the word ‘superior’, I would pull out a check for $700 bucks and put my iPhone on the table and ask them to give me their replacement. Don’t argue with me. Don’t debate with me. You know better than me. Here’s my money. I’m waiting to be impressed.

An indication of good times though, is clearly from the lack of those outrageous death-threats flying around on FB this time. After CES, they have gotten factual, and that’s a mighty good sign. The N900 actually looks pretty good, and if they can fix the app situation (which is still bad) they just might do well. I was also impressed at HTC adding the 16mp camera. Now don’t you go telling me it may not add quality. We dished it out to them when they defended lack of dual-core, and we must face it. When it comes to specs, a WP has the most powerful camera I’ve heard of in a phone.

The software though really has to deliver fast and has to finish off the remaining ‘magic’ of the equation. Apps, including Facebook’s own, must provide full-fidelity (a concept I learnt is very important, and I learnt it at and from Microsoft.) Skype MUST match the Facetime/iMessage magic. If not none, then at least minimal, signin dialogs, and stuff. Just detect what’s on the other side, and enable video and Messenger IMs without the two users first having added each other as contacts on Messenger or Skype. If they pull that off, and do it fast, and make sure they remain feature-compatible with other phones – they just may expect my few hundred bucks for my next upgrade in 2 years.

I do see a good change in attitude. Instead of speaking of killing things and being the No 1 in 10 years, they are slowly learning the reality that others have pretty decent products too and will probably be here for a while. Making a good product and selling a decent amount of phones in the short-term may not be a bad compromise to dreams of world domination in four years.

After five years of watching shitty products being promoted with zeal, I’m happy to see great products promoted calmly for what they are – simply good products. I’m impressed!

Theme: Silver is the New Black. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 122 other followers